Attaway v. Odom
This text of 144 S.E. 146 (Attaway v. Odom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The court did not err in overruling the demurrer.
2. “A large part of the evidence incorporated in the brief of evidence is made up of numerous lengthy documents which are set out in full in the record, no attempt being made to abbreviate or brief them as required by law. This being true, this court, as it has frequently ruled, will not undertake to pass upon the assignments of error requiring a consideration of the evidence. It will be presumed that there was sufficient evidence to authorize the verdict.” Henslee v. Harper, 148 Ga. 621 (2) (97 S. E. 667), and cit. Under this ruling and the state of the record in the instant case, this court “will not undertake to pass upon the assignments of error requiring a consideration of the evidence,” and “it will be presumed that there was sufficient evidence to authorize the verdict.”
3. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial (many of winch are too incomplete to be considered by this court) show no cause for a reversal of the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
144 S.E. 146, 38 Ga. App. 351, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attaway-v-odom-gactapp-1928.