Attaway v. Medical Professionals

District Court, S.D. Illinois·Decided October 11, 2023·No. 3:23-cv-02771·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

MICHEAL N.B. ATTAWAY, #Y55493, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 23-cv-02771-JPG ) CRAWFORD COUNTY JAIL and ) NURSE PRACTITIONER AMANDA, ) ) Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM & ORDER GILBERT, District Judge: Plaintiff Micheal Attaway filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for constitutional deprivations that arose during his pretrial detention at Crawford County Jail. In the Amended Complaint,1 Plaintiff alleges that he sustained serious injuries in a hit-and-run accident prior to his detention at the Jail on June 14, 2022. (Doc. 14). He requested medical treatment for his ongoing injuries and excruciating pain, but Nurse Practitioner Amanda refused to provide him with any, saying that “there is no acute pharmaceutical treatment for that.” Id. Plaintiff seeks money damages and injunctive relief.2 Id. The Amended Complaint is now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, which requires the Court to screen prisoner complaints and filter out non-meritorious claims. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Any portion that is legally frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim for

1 Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint (Doc. 14) on September 14, 2023, one month after filing the original Complaint (Doc. 1). The Amended Complaint supersedes and replaces the original Complaint and renders it void. See Flannery v. Recording Indus. Ass’n of Am., 354 F.3d 632, 638 n. 1 (7th Cir. 2004). 2 Plaintiff specifically seeks a court order requiring the Jail to provide their inmates with adequate care and treatment. The Court construes this request as one for permanent injunctive relief at the close of the case. If Plaintiff requires interim relief, he may file a separate motion for temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 at any time during the pending action. relief, or requests money damages from an immune defendant must be dismissed. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). At this juncture, the factual allegations are liberally construed. Rodriguez v. Plymouth Ambulance Serv., 577 F.3d 816, 821 (7th Cir. 2009). Discussion

Based on the allegations, the Court designates the following claim in the pro se Amended Complaint (Doc. 14): Count 1: Fourteenth Amendment claim against Nurse Practitioner Amanda and Crawford County Jail for denying Plaintiff timely and adequate medical attention for ongoing injuries and excruciating pain he endured in a hit-and- run accident prior to his pretrial detention at the Jail on June 14, 2022.

Any claim in the Amended Complaint that is not addressed herein should be considered dismissed without prejudice as inadequately pled under Twombly.3 The Fourteenth Amendment due process standard governs a pretrial detainee’s claim of inadequate medical care.4 Miranda v. County of Lake, 900 F.3d 335, 352-54 (7th Cir. 2018). Under the Fourteenth Amendment, a plaintiff must allege that the medical care he received, or was denied, was objectively unreasonable, and each defendant acted with “purposeful, knowing, or reckless disregard of the consequences” related to the provision of his care. Id. at 353-54. The Court considers “the totality of facts and circumstances” when deciding whether a challenged action was objectively unreasonable. Mays v. Dart, 974 F.3d 810, 819 (7th Cir. 2020). “[N]egligent conduct does not offend the Due Process Clause.” Miranda, 900 F.3d at 353. The allegations articulate a claim against Nurse Practitioner Amanda under this standard. According to the Amended Complaint, she responded in an objectively unreasonable manner by

3 See Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007) (an action fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted if it does not plead “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face”). 4 The allegations against Nurse Practitioner Amanda also survive review under the Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference standard that applies to claims of inadequate medical care brought by convicted persons. However, the allegations support no claim, under either standard, against the Jail. refusing the plaintiff’s requests for treatment of lingering injuries and excruciating pain at the Jail. Count 1 shall receive further review against the Jail’s nurse practitioner. However, this claim shall be dismissed against Crawford County Jail because this entity is not a “person” who is subject to suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s designation of this

defendant may represent an attempt to hold the county liable for his injuries. See Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs. of New York, 436 U.S. 658, 690, 694 (1978). However, municipal liability under § 1983 arises from the execution of a government policy or custom that causes a constitutional injury. Id. Plaintiff points to no such policy or custom. Count 1 shall be dismissed without prejudice against the Jail. The Court will add the Crawford County Jail Administrator, in his or her official capacity, as a defendant based on Plaintiff’s request for injunctive relief. See Gonzalez v. Feinerman, 663 F.3d 311, 315 (7th Cir. 2011); Daniel v. Cook Cty., 833 F.3d 728, 737 (7th Cir. 2016) (“[T]he constitutional duty under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to provide adequate health care rests on the custodian.”). This defendant shall be responsible for carrying out any injunctive relief

ordered herein. Disposition

IT IS ORDERED that the Amended Complaint (Doc. 14) survives preliminary review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. COUNT 1 will receive further review against NURSE PRACTITIONER AMANDA, in her individual capacity, and COUNT 1 is DISMISSED without prejudice against CRAWFORD COUNTY JAIL for failure to state a claim. The Clerk’s Office is DIRECTED to ADD Defendant CRAWFORD COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATOR (official capacity) to implement any injunctive relief ordered herein. Because this case addresses a medical claim, the Clerk’s Office is also DIRECTED to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. IT IS ORDERED that as to COUNT 1, the Clerk of Court shall prepare for Defendant CRAWFORD COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATOR (official capacity) and NURSE

PRACTITIONER AMANDA (individual capacity): (1) Form 5 (Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons), and (2) Form 6 (Waiver of Service of Summons). The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail these forms, a copy of the Amended Complaint (Doc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attaway v. Medical Professionals, (S.D. Ill. 2023).

Attaway v. Medical Professionals (Attaway v. Medical Professionals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.
436 U.S. 658 (Supreme Court, 1978)
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
550 U.S. 544 (Supreme Court, 2007)
Gonzalez v. Feinerman
663 F.3d 311 (Seventh Circuit, 2011)
Rodriguez v. Plymouth Ambulance Service
577 F.3d 816 (Seventh Circuit, 2009)
Alfredo Miranda v. County of Lake
900 F.3d 335 (Seventh Circuit, 2018)
Anthony Mays v. Thomas Dart
974 F.3d 810 (Seventh Circuit, 2020)
Daniel v. Cook County
833 F.3d 728 (Seventh Circuit, 2016)