Attaway v. Glover

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois
DecidedDecember 10, 2024
Docket3:24-cv-01565
StatusUnknown

This text of Attaway v. Glover (Attaway v. Glover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attaway v. Glover, (S.D. Ill. 2024).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

MICHEAL N.B. ATTAWAY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 24-cv-1565-SPM ) C/O GLOVER, ) and JOHN DOES 1 AND 2, ) ) Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

McGLYNN, District Judge:

This matter is before the Court for case management. Plaintiff filed this action on June 21, 2024, after his release from prison. On November 12, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause about his desire to maintain this action, noting it was one of 22 cases Plaintiff had filed in a one-year period, and that many of his cases had been dismissed in recent months for non- prosecution. Plaintiff was invited to notify the Court within 21 days, by December 3, 2024, of his wishes to pursue or withdraw this matter. Plaintiff has not responded. Therefore, the Court now finds that Plaintiff has abandoned this action so it will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to prosecute. FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b); see generally James v. McDonald’s Corp., 417 F.3d 672, 681 (7th Cir. 2005); Ladien v. Astrachan, 128 F.3d 1051 (7th Cir. 1997); Lucien v. Breweur, 9 F.3d 26, 29 (7th Cir. 1993) (dismissal for failure to prosecute is presumptively with prejudice). If Plaintiff wishes to appeal this dismissal, his notice of appeal must be filed with this Court within thirty days of the entry of judgment. FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(1)(A). A motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis must set forth the issues Plaintiff plans to present on appeal. See FED. R. APP. P. 24(a)(1)(C). If Plaintiff does choose to appeal, he will be liable for the $505.00 appellate filing fee irrespective of the outcome of the appeal. See FED. R. APP. P. 3(e); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); Ammons v. Gerlinger, 547 F.3d 724, 725-26 (7th Cir. 2008); Sloan v. Lesza, 181 F.3d 857, 858-59 (7th Cir. 1999); Lucien v. Jockisch, 133 F.3d 464, 467 (7th Cir. 1998). Moreover,

if the appeal is found to be nonmeritorious, Plaintiff may also incur another “strike.” A proper and timely motion filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) may toll the 30-day appeal deadline. FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(4). A Rule 59(e) motion must be filed no more than twenty-eight (28) days after the entry of the judgment, and this 28-day deadline cannot be extended. The Clerk is DIRECTED to CLOSE THIS CASE and enter judgment accordingly. Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) is DENIED as MOOT in light of the dismissal for failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: December 10, 2024

s/ Stephen P. McGlynn STEPHEN P. MCGLYNN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Attaway v. Glover, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attaway-v-glover-ilsd-2024.