Attard v. Tradewind Industries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Attard v. Tradewind Industries, Inc.

89 A.D.2d 508, 452 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17545

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 1, 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 89 A.D.2d 508 (Attard v. Tradewind Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attard v. Tradewind Industries, Inc., 89 A.D.2d 508, 452 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17545 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mercorella, J.), entered March 17, 1981, modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, to add thereto a provision that, in addition to furnishing to defendant-appellant the medical reports of treating physicians, plaintiffs-respon[509]*509dents shall make available to defendant-appellant for inspection and copying the relevant medical records, inclusive of photographs, relating to plaintiff’s disability, or, in lieu thereof, shall furnish copies thereof, and, in addition, as to any such records not in plaintiffs’ possession, shall furnish appropriate authorization for such inspection and copying and otherwise affirmed, without costs. (See Padilla u Damascus, 16 AD2d 71, 73, affd 12 NY2d 1059; Hoenig v Westphal, 52 NY2d 605;DanoffvRichardson-Merrell,Inc., 70 AD2d 543; CPLR 3124.) Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Markewich, Fein and Milonas, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mercorella, J.), entered March 17, 1981, modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, to add thereto a provision that, in addition to furnishing to defendant-appellant the medical reports of treating physicians, plaintiffs-respon[509]*509dents shall make available to defendant-appellant for inspection and copying the relevant medical records, inclusive of photographs, relating to plaintiff’s disability, or, in lieu thereof, shall furnish copies thereof, and, in addition, as to any such records not in plaintiffs’ possession, shall furnish appropriate authorization for such inspection and copying and otherwise affirmed, without costs. (See Padilla u Damascus, 16 AD2d 71, 73, affd 12 NY2d 1059; Hoenig v Westphal, 52 NY2d 605;DanoffvRichardson-Merrell,Inc., 70 AD2d 543; CPLR 3124.) Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Markewich, Fein and Milonas, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 A.D.2d 508, 452 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attard-v-tradewind-industries-inc-nyappdiv-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack