Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Attaldo v. Eber

Attaldo v. Eber

155 A.D.2d 994
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1989
StatusPublished

This text of 155 A.D.2d 994 (Attaldo v. Eber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attaldo v. Eber, 155 A.D.2d 994 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner concedes that his petitions contain insufficient valid signatures for his nomination (see, Matter of Lavelle v Gonzalez, 93 AD2d 896, affd 59 NY2d 670). (Appeál from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Patlow, J.— Election Law.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Davis, JJ. (Order entered Oct. 17, 1989.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lavelle v. Gonzalez
450 N.E.2d 218 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Lavelle v. Gonzalez
93 A.D.2d 896 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 A.D.2d 994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attaldo-v-eber-nyappdiv-1989.