AT&T Mobility LLC v. NASCAR
This text of AT&T Mobility LLC v. NASCAR (AT&T Mobility LLC v. NASCAR) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AUG 13, 2007 No. 07-12299 THOMAS K. KAHN ________________________ CLERK
AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, f.k.a. Cingular Wireless LLC,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR STOCK CAR AUTO RACING, INC.,
Defendant-Appellant,
SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION,
Intervenor-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _________________________
O R D E R:
Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, CARNES and FAY, Circuit Judges. The parties are hereby advised that the court is issuing its opinion in this
expedited case today. Any petitions for rehearing shall be filed in the clerk’s
office no later than five days from today. The parties are reminded that under the
provisions of Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-3 entitled “Extraordinary Nature of
Petitions for En Banc Consideration”:
Alleged errors in a panel’s determination of
state law . . . are matters for rehearing
before the panel but not for en banc
consideration.
Please govern yourselves accordingly.
The court will continue to expedite its consideration of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
AT&T Mobility LLC v. NASCAR, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/att-mobility-llc-v-nascar-ca11-2007.