AT&T Inc. and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company D/B/A AT&T Texas v. Andrea Christian and Amber Hicks

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: February 9, 2018
• Docket: 05-17-01395-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

Dismissed and Opinion Filed February 9, 2018

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01395-CV

AT&T INC. AND SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY D/B/A AT&T TEXAS, Appellants V. ANDREA CHRISTIAN AND AMBER HICKS, Appellees

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-08124

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Seeking to appeal the trial court’s denial of their rule 91a motion to dismiss a baseless

claim, appellants have filed a petition for permissive interlocutory appeal. We deny the petition

and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §

51.014(d) (West Supp. 2017); Tex. R. App. P. 28.3, 42.3(a).

/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE

171395F.P05 S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

AT&T INC. AND SOUTHWESTERN On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY D/B/A Court, Dallas County, Texas AT&T TEXAS, Appellants Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-08124. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. No. 05-17-01395-CV V. Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating. ANDREA CHRISTIAN AND AMBER HICKS, Appellees

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction.

It is ORDERED that appellees ANDREA CHRISTIAN AND AMBER HICKS recover their costs of this appeal from appellants AT&T INC. AND SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY D/B/A AT&T TEXAS.

Judgment entered February 9, 2018

–2–