AT&T Enterprises, LLC v. Atos IT Solutions and Services, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 23, 2021·No. 1:21-cv-04550·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: -------------------------------------- x DATE FILED: 11/23/ 2021 : AT&T CORP., : : Plaintiff, : : -against- : : ATOS IT SOLUTIONS AND SERVICES, : INC. : : Defendant. : : Case No. 1:21-cv-04550-GHW -------------------------------------- x : ATOS IT SOLUTIONS AND SERVICES, : INC., : : STIPULATED Counterclaim Plaintiff, : CONFIDENTIALITY : AGREEMENT AND -against- : PROTECTIVE ORDER : AT&T CORP. : Counterclaim Defendant. : : -------------------------------------- x GREGORY H. WOODS, District Judge: WHEREAS, all of the parties to this action (collectively, the “Parties” and each individually, a “Party”) request that this Court issue a protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) to protect the confidentiality of nonpublic and competitively sensitive information that they may need to disclose in connection with discovery in this action; WHEREAS, the Parties, through counsel, agree to the following terms; and WHEREAS, this Court finds that good cause exists for issuance of an appropriately tailored confidentiality order governing the pretrial phase of this action; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Parties to this action, their respective officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, any other person in active concert or participation with any of the foregoing, and all other persons with actual notice of this Order will adhere to the following terms, upon pain of contempt: 1. With respect to “Discovery Material” (i.e., information of any kind produced

or disclosed in the course of discovery in this action) that a person has designated as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” pursuant to this Order (collectively, “Confidential Discovery Material”), no person subject to this Order may disclose such Confidential Discovery Material to anyone else except as expressly permitted hereunder: 2. The Party or person producing or disclosing Discovery Material (each, “Producing Party”) may designate as Confidential only the portion of such material that it reasonably and in good faith believes consists of: (a) previously non-disclosed financial information (including without limitation profitability reports or estimates, percentage fees, design fees, royalty rates,

minimum guarantee payments, prices, pricing mechanisms, formulas or costs, sales reports, and sale margins); (b) previously non-disclosed material relating to ownership or control of any non-public company; (c) previously non-disclosed business plans, product-development information, or marketing plans; (d) any information that may be subject to foreign data protection and privacy laws and regulations, including but not limited to the European Union (“EU”) General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) (Regulation (EU) 2016/679) and/or any other relevant laws and regulations; (e) information prohibited from disclosure by statute; (f) information that reveals trade secrets; (g) research, technical, commercial, or financial information that the Producing

Party has maintained as confidential; (h) competitive technical information; (i) competitive business information; (j) personally identifiable information; or (k) income tax returns. (l) any other category of information given confidential status by this Court after the date of this Order. 3. The Producing Party may designate as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” only the portion of such Confidential material that (A) the opposing Party is not lawfully

entitled to receive (e.g., where disclosure is prohibited by statute or otherwise), or (B) the Producing Party reasonably and in good faith believes (i) is unknown to the opposing Party, (ii) would reveal significant Confidential Information, or technical or business information of the Producing Party, and (iii) is so highly sensitive that its disclosure could result in competitive or commercial disadvantage to the Producing Party. 4. With respect to the Confidential or Highly Confidential portion of any Discovery Material other than deposition transcripts and exhibits, the Producing Party or its counsel may designate such portion as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” by stamping or otherwise clearly marking as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” the protected portion in a manner that will not interfere with legibility or audibility. 5. A Producing Party or its counsel may designate deposition exhibits or portions of deposition transcripts as Confidential Discovery Material either by: (a) indicating on the record during the deposition that a question calls for Confidential or Highly Confidential information, in

which case the reporter will bind the transcript of the designated testimony in a separate volume and mark it as “Confidential Information Governed by Protective Order;” or (b) notifying the reporter and all counsel of record, in writing, within 30 days after a deposition has concluded, of the specific pages and lines of the transcript that are to be designated “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only,” in which case all counsel receiving the transcript will be responsible for marking the copies of the designated transcript in their possession or under their control as directed by the Producing Party or that person’s counsel. During the 30-day period following a deposition, all Parties will treat the entire deposition transcript as if it had been designated Confidential.

6. If at any time before the termination of this action a Producing Party realizes that it should have designated as Confidential or Highly Confidential some portion(s) of Discovery Material that it previously produced without limitation, the Producing Party may so designate such material by notifying all Parties in writing. Thereafter, all persons subject to this Order will treat such designated portion(s) of the Discovery Material as Confidential or Highly Confidential, as the case may be. In addition, the Producing Party shall provide each other Party with replacement versions of such Discovery Material that bears the “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” designation within two business days of providing such notice. 7. Nothing contained in this Order will be construed as: (a) a waiver by a Party or person of its right to object to any discovery request; (b) a waiver of any privilege or protection; or (c) a ruling regarding the admissibility at trial of any document, testimony, or other evidence. 8. Where a Producing Party has designated Discovery Material as Confidential, other persons subject to this Order may disclose such information only to the following persons:

(a) the Parties to this action, their insurers, and counsel to their insurers; (b) counsel retained specifically for this action, including any paralegal, clerical, or other assistant that such outside counsel employs and assigns to this matter; (c) outside vendors or service providers (such as copy-service providers and document-management consultants) that counsel hire and assign to this matter; (d) any mediator or arbitrator that the Parties engage in this matter or that this Court appoints, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AT&T Enterprises, LLC v. Atos IT Solutions and Services, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

AT&T Enterprises, LLC v. Atos IT Solutions and Services, Inc. (AT&T Enterprises, LLC v. Atos IT Solutions and Services, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)