AT&T Communications v. Division of Corrections

West Virginia Court of Claims

AT&T Communications v. Division of Corrections

19 Ct. Cl. 6

West Virginia Court of Claims·Decided December 2, 1991·No. CC-91-65·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and respondent’s Answer.

Claimant seeks payment of $318.92 for telecommunication services provided respondent.

Respondent, in its Answer, admits the validity of the claim, but states that there were insufficient funds in its appropriation for the fiscal year in question from which to pay the claim.

While the Court believes that this is a claim which in equity and good conscience should be paid, the Court further believes that an award cannot be recommended based upon the decision in Airkem Sales and Services, et al. vs. Dept. of Mental Health, 8 Ct. Cl. 180 (1971).

Claim disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and respondent’s Answer.

Claimant seeks payment of $318.92 for telecommunication services provided respondent.

Respondent, in its Answer, admits the validity of the claim, but states that there were insufficient funds in its appropriation for the fiscal year in question from which to pay the claim.

While the Court believes that this is a claim which in equity and good conscience should be paid, the Court further believes that an award cannot be recommended based upon the decision in Airkem Sales and Services, et al. vs. Dept. of Mental Health, 8 Ct. Cl. 180 (1971).

Claim disallowed.

AT&T Communications v. Division of Corrections, 19 Ct. Cl. 6 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1991).

Pincite

19 Ct. Cl. 6 (AT&T Communications v. Division of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related