At&T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. v. City of Dallas
249 F.3d 336
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in At&T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. v. City of Dallas. Read the opinion of the Court — 243 F.3d 928 →
Opinion
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:
The petition for rehearing filed by Sprint Communications Company is DENIED.
On March 26, 2001, Teligent, Inc. submitted a letter requesting a correction in the language of the March 15, 2001 opinion in this case. Treating the letter as a petition for rehearing, the petition is granted as follows: Footnote ** will be added after the first sentence of the first paragraph. This footnote will read as follows:
Southwestern Bell filed a motion to dismiss its appeal against Teligent, Inc. (“Teligent”), which this court granted on March 30, 2000. Thus, the judgment in favor of Teligent is not affected by this appeal.
In all other respects, the opinion remains unchanged, and all other relief is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
At&T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. v. City of Dallas, 249 F.3d 336 (5th Cir. 2001).
249 F.3d 336 (At&T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. v. City of Dallas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
AT&T Communications v. City of Dallas
249 F.3d 336 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)