Atraqchi v. Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation

186 F. App'x 5
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided June 27, 2006·No. No. 06-5021·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellants. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed January 13, 2006, be affirmed. The complaint contains factual allegations that are so implausible as to be “fantastic or delusional.” Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327-28, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989). Accordingly, the district court properly dis[6]*6missed the ease as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atraqchi v. Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, 186 F. App'x 5 (D.C. Cir. 2006).

186 F. App'x 5 (Atraqchi v. Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neitzke v. Williams
490 U.S. 319 (Supreme Court, 1989)