Aton v. Wackenhut Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Aton v. Wackenhut Corp.

61 F. App'x 96

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 17, 2003

DocketNo. 02-1878

StatusPublished

This text of 61 F. App'x 96 (Aton v. Wackenhut Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aton v. Wackenhut Corp., 61 F. App'x 96 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rasun Heru Anpu Aton appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Wackenhut in his employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Aton v. Wackenhut Corp., No. CA-01-598-S (D. Md. July 9, 2002; filed July 10, 2002, entered July 11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Rasun Heru Anpu Aton appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Wackenhut in his employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Aton v. Wackenhut Corp., No. CA-01-598-S (D. Md. July 9, 2002; filed July 10, 2002, entered July 11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 F. App'x 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aton-v-wackenhut-corp-ca4-2003.