Atlas v. Stolberg

694 So. 2d 772, 1997 WL 194635
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 23, 1997·No. No. 95-3344·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm as to all issues. Appellees are immune under the principles of Levin, Middlebrooks, Mabie, Thomas, Mayes & Mitchell, P. A. v. United States Fire Insurance Co., 639 So.2d 606 (Fla.1994). Appellees may raise this affirmative defense in a motion to dismiss as it appears on the face of the complaint. See Stern v. First Nat’l Bank of S. Miami, 275 So.2d 58 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). With respect to appellant’s claim that the attorneys are liable under 42 U.S.C. section 1983, it is well settled that private lawyers are not state actors for purposes of section 1983 liability. See Barnard v. Young, 720 F.2d 1188 (10th Cir.1983); Black v. Bayer, 672 F.2d 309, 314 (3d Cir.1982).

Affirmed.

GUNTHER, C.J., and WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atlas v. Stolberg, 694 So. 2d 772, 1997 WL 194635 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

694 So. 2d 772 (Atlas v. Stolberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Prudential Ins. v. Florida Dept. of Ins.
694 So. 2d 772 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)