Atlas v. Smily

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Atlas v. Smily

117 A.D.3d 471, 984 N.Y.S.2d 592

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 8, 2014

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 117 A.D.3d 471 (Atlas v. Smily) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Atlas v. Smily, 117 A.D.3d 471, 984 N.Y.S.2d 592 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lori S. Sattler, J.), entered May 1, 2013, which denied plaintiff’s motion for an order permitting him to sell the marital residence pursuant to the terms of the parties’ stipulation of settlement, and granting him a money judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, to the extent of awarding plaintiff a judgment in the amount of $1,943, and remanding the matter for a hearing on the issue of the parties’ youngest child’s emancipation.

Plaintiff alleges that he is entitled to a money judgment for mortgage payments he made on the marital residence following the emancipation of the parties’ children and to compel the sale of the residence. Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation of settlement, before plaintiff may ultimately seek to compel the sale of the subject residence, it must be determined that the parties’ [472]*472children have been emancipated and the stipulation of settlement provides that a child is emancipated by, inter alia, “[p]ermanent residence away from the residence of [defendant] [m]other.” Here, the parties’ submissions on the issue of their younger daughter’s emancipation disclosed the existence of genuine questions of fact warranting a hearing on the issue (see Readick v Readick, 80 AD3d 512, 513 [1st Dept 2011]; Matter of Forte v Forte, 304 AD2d 577 [2d Dept 2003]). Although a residence at college does not constitute an emancipation event, there is evidence that the child changed her permanent residence prior to commencing college (compare Trepel v Trepel, 40 Misc 3d 1044 [Sup Ct, NY County 2013]).

Plaintiff is entitled to a money judgment in the amount of $1,943 based on the uncontested evidence that defendant owed him $3,786.13 for their child’s high school tuition, that he received only $1,843.13, and that he notified defendant of her default and gave her time to cure as required by the parties’ stipulation.

Concur—Tom, J.P, Acosta, Andrias, DeGrasse and Richter, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lori S. Sattler, J.), entered May 1, 2013, which denied plaintiff’s motion for an order permitting him to sell the marital residence pursuant to the terms of the parties’ stipulation of settlement, and granting him a money judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, to the extent of awarding plaintiff a judgment in the amount of $1,943, and remanding the matter for a hearing on the issue of the parties’ youngest child’s emancipation.

Plaintiff alleges that he is entitled to a money judgment for mortgage payments he made on the marital residence following the emancipation of the parties’ children and to compel the sale of the residence. Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation of settlement, before plaintiff may ultimately seek to compel the sale of the subject residence, it must be determined that the parties’ [472]*472children have been emancipated and the stipulation of settlement provides that a child is emancipated by, inter alia, “[p]ermanent residence away from the residence of [defendant] [m]other.” Here, the parties’ submissions on the issue of their younger daughter’s emancipation disclosed the existence of genuine questions of fact warranting a hearing on the issue (see Readick v Readick, 80 AD3d 512, 513 [1st Dept 2011]; Matter of Forte v Forte, 304 AD2d 577 [2d Dept 2003]). Although a residence at college does not constitute an emancipation event, there is evidence that the child changed her permanent residence prior to commencing college (compare Trepel v Trepel, 40 Misc 3d 1044 [Sup Ct, NY County 2013]).

Plaintiff is entitled to a money judgment in the amount of $1,943 based on the uncontested evidence that defendant owed him $3,786.13 for their child’s high school tuition, that he received only $1,843.13, and that he notified defendant of her default and gave her time to cure as required by the parties’ stipulation.

Concur—Tom, J.P, Acosta, Andrias, DeGrasse and Richter, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 A.D.3d 471, 984 N.Y.S.2d 592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlas-v-smily-nyappdiv-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack