Atlas v. Dick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Atlas v. Dick

275 A.D.2d 670

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 7, 1949·Published

Opinion

Inconsistent findings are reversed and new findings will be made. The contractual obligations assumed by respondent after filing his application for a building permit and prior to the issuance thereof, were not such acts as to vest any rights which could not be defeated by the subsequent amendment of the local ordinance. (Matter of Fox Lane Corp. v. Mann, 216 App. Div. 813, affd. 243 N. V. 550.) The cases of Matter of Calton Court, Inc., V. Switzer (221 App. Div. 799) and Matter of Dubow v. Ross (254 App. Div. 706) are readily distinguishable. Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice. [192 Misc. 843.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Inconsistent findings are reversed and new findings will be made. The contractual obligations assumed by respondent after filing his application for a building permit and prior to the issuance thereof, were not such acts as to vest any rights which could not be defeated by the subsequent amendment of the local ordinance. (Matter of Fox Lane Corp. v. Mann, 216 App. Div. 813, affd. 243 N. V. 550.) The cases of Matter of Calton Court, Inc., V. Switzer (221 App. Div. 799) and Matter of Dubow v. Ross (254 App. Div. 706) are readily distinguishable. Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice. [192 Misc. 843.]

Atlas v. Dick, 275 A.D.2d 670 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

275 A.D.2d 670 (Atlas v. Dick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related