Atlas v. Dick
This text of 275 A.D.2d 670 (Atlas v. Dick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Inconsistent findings are reversed and new findings will be made. The contractual obligations assumed by respondent after filing his application for a building permit and prior to the issuance thereof, were not such acts as to vest any rights which could not be defeated by the subsequent amendment of the local ordinance. (Matter of Fox Lane Corp. v. Mann, 216 App. Div. 813, affd. 243 N. V. 550.) The cases of Matter of Calton Court, Inc., V. Switzer (221 App. Div. 799) and Matter of Dubow v. Ross (254 App. Div. 706) are readily distinguishable. Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice. [192 Misc. 843.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
275 A.D.2d 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlas-v-dick-nyappdiv-1949.