Atlas Supply Co. v. Colgate Contracting, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Atlas Supply Co. v. Colgate Contracting, Inc.

8 A.D.2d 793, 187 N.Y.S.2d 383, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7922

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 18, 1959

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 A.D.2d 793 (Atlas Supply Co. v. Colgate Contracting, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Atlas Supply Co. v. Colgate Contracting, Inc., 8 A.D.2d 793, 187 N.Y.S.2d 383, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination of the Appellate Term and the judgment of the Municipal Court unanimously reversed on the law and on the facts and complaint dismissed, with costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant in this court and $30 costs and disbursements in the Appellate Term. Plaintiff has failed to establish any negligence on the part of the defendant. The claim that the doctrine of res ipso loquitur is applicable is clearly without merit. This fire, of unexplained origin, could have been caused by any number of circumstances over which the defendant would have no control. Moreover the employees of the plaintiff were present at the scene when the fire originated and were in an equal if not even better position than defendant to explain its origin. It cannot be said, therefore, that it became the duty of defendant to account for this accident inasmuch as there could be no presumption of negligence on the facts of this ease. It may be noted that although there was evidence that the pit contained inflammable material the plaintiff’s witnesses testified that the fire did not occur in the pit. Accordingly, the complaint should have been dismissed. Concur — Rabin, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination of the Appellate Term and the judgment of the Municipal Court unanimously reversed on the law and on the facts and complaint dismissed, with costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant in this court and $30 costs and disbursements in the Appellate Term. Plaintiff has failed to establish any negligence on the part of the defendant. The claim that the doctrine of res ipso loquitur is applicable is clearly without merit. This fire, of unexplained origin, could have been caused by any number of circumstances over which the defendant would have no control. Moreover the employees of the plaintiff were present at the scene when the fire originated and were in an equal if not even better position than defendant to explain its origin. It cannot be said, therefore, that it became the duty of defendant to account for this accident inasmuch as there could be no presumption of negligence on the facts of this ease. It may be noted that although there was evidence that the pit contained inflammable material the plaintiff’s witnesses testified that the fire did not occur in the pit. Accordingly, the complaint should have been dismissed. Concur — Rabin, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.2d 793, 187 N.Y.S.2d 383, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlas-supply-co-v-colgate-contracting-inc-nyappdiv-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack