Atlas Realty Corp. v. Jones

Supreme Court of Florida

Atlas Realty Corp. v. Jones

162 So. 2d 261, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2880

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedApril 1, 1964

DocketNo. 32936

StatusPublished

This text of 162 So. 2d 261 (Atlas Realty Corp. v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Atlas Realty Corp. v. Jones, 162 So. 2d 261, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2880 (Fla. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to the prayer of a petition for certiorari because of an alleged conflict between the instant decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, and prior decisions of this Court, we issued the writ. Inasmuch as a jurisdictional conflict of decisions appeared questionable, we set the matter for hearing upon both jurisdiction and merits. Having heard oral arguments and upon further careful study of the record and briefs, we are now convinced that the District Court followed the prior decisions of this Court and did not render a decision in conflict therewith. In consequence of this view the writ of certiorari heretofore issued, is hereby discharged, Fla.App., 154 So.2d 905.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, O’CON^ NELL, CALDWELL and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to the prayer of a petition for certiorari because of an alleged conflict between the instant decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, and prior decisions of this Court, we issued the writ. Inasmuch as a jurisdictional conflict of decisions appeared questionable, we set the matter for hearing upon both jurisdiction and merits. Having heard oral arguments and upon further careful study of the record and briefs, we are now convinced that the District Court followed the prior decisions of this Court and did not render a decision in conflict therewith. In consequence of this view the writ of certiorari heretofore issued, is hereby discharged, Fla.App., 154 So.2d 905.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, O’CON^ NELL, CALDWELL and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 So. 2d 261, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlas-realty-corp-v-jones-fla-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack