Atlas Powder Company v. T. E. Leonard

Sixth Circuit

Atlas Powder Company v. T. E. Leonard

245 F.2d 676, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3270

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedApril 4, 1957

Docket12941_1

StatusPublished

This text of 245 F.2d 676 (Atlas Powder Company v. T. E. Leonard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Atlas Powder Company v. T. E. Leonard, 245 F.2d 676, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3270 (6th Cir. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal by the Atlas Powder Company, an employer, from a money judgment in favor of one of its employees, T. E. Leonard, in an action wherein that employee sought recovery under the Workmen’s Compensation Laws of Tennessee, has been heard upon the oral arguments and briefs of the attorneys for the contending parties and upon the entire record in the case;

And it appearing from a consideration of the arguments, briefs and record that the judgment of the district court — upon the basis of the opinion of District Judge Darr and his findings of fact and conclusions of law, 152 F.Supp. 81, is supported by the evidence and is not clearly erroneous but is based upon sound juristic reasoning in the application of controlling law;

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal by the Atlas Powder Company, an employer, from a money judgment in favor of one of its employees, T. E. Leonard, in an action wherein that employee sought recovery under the Workmen’s Compensation Laws of Tennessee, has been heard upon the oral arguments and briefs of the attorneys for the contending parties and upon the entire record in the case;

And it appearing from a consideration of the arguments, briefs and record that the judgment of the district court — upon the basis of the opinion of District Judge Darr and his findings of fact and conclusions of law, 152 F.Supp. 81, is supported by the evidence and is not clearly erroneous but is based upon sound juristic reasoning in the application of controlling law;

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 F.2d 676, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlas-powder-company-v-t-e-leonard-ca6-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack