Atlas Powder Co. v. Mid Island Laundry Co.

175 Misc. 960, 25 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1941 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1508
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided February 21, 1941·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A party may be precluded only as to those matters of which particulars have not been furnished. (Duncan Realty Co. v. Independent Trouser Co., Inc., 150 Misc 902) It was error , to preclude defendant from offering evidence in support of its counterclaim. Defendant, having served a bill which it deemed a compliance with the order, was not in default. If the plaintiff claimed that the bill was defective or insufficient, it should have moved for an order precluding defendant from offering any evidence in support of the items which had been omitted unless a further bill was served.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur. Present — Hammer, Shientag and Miller, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atlas Powder Co. v. Mid Island Laundry Co., 175 Misc. 960, 25 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1941 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1508 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

175 Misc. 960 (Atlas Powder Co. v. Mid Island Laundry Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Caupain v. Johnson
20 A.D.2d 712 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)