Atlas Powder Co. v. Mid Island Laundry Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Atlas Powder Co. v. Mid Island Laundry Co.

175 Misc. 960, 25 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1941 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1508

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 21, 1941

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 175 Misc. 960 (Atlas Powder Co. v. Mid Island Laundry Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Atlas Powder Co. v. Mid Island Laundry Co., 175 Misc. 960, 25 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1941 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1508 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A party may be precluded only as to those matters of which particulars have not been furnished. (Duncan Realty Co. v. Independent Trouser Co., Inc., 150 Misc 902) It was error , to preclude defendant from offering evidence in support of its counterclaim. Defendant, having served a bill which it deemed a compliance with the order, was not in default. If the plaintiff claimed that the bill was defective or insufficient, it should have moved for an order precluding defendant from offering any evidence in support of the items which had been omitted unless a further bill was served.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur. Present — Hammer, Shientag and Miller, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

A party may be precluded only as to those matters of which particulars have not been furnished. (Duncan Realty Co. v. Independent Trouser Co., Inc., 150 Misc 902) It was error , to preclude defendant from offering evidence in support of its counterclaim. Defendant, having served a bill which it deemed a compliance with the order, was not in default. If the plaintiff claimed that the bill was defective or insufficient, it should have moved for an order precluding defendant from offering any evidence in support of the items which had been omitted unless a further bill was served.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur. Present — Hammer, Shientag and Miller, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 Misc. 960, 25 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1941 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlas-powder-co-v-mid-island-laundry-co-nyappterm-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack