Atlas Mfg. Co. v. Ashley

D.C. Circuit

Atlas Mfg. Co. v. Ashley

166 F.2d 209, 82 U.S. App. D.C. 399

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedFebruary 3, 1947

DocketNo. 9369

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 166 F.2d 209 (Atlas Mfg. Co. v. Ashley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Atlas Mfg. Co. v. Ashley, 166 F.2d 209, 82 U.S. App. D.C. 399 (D.C. Cir. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order of the District Court is not intended to have and will not have any effect upon the rights of the parties to establish, in litigation which is pending in Florida, any claims or defenses which they might have established in that litigation if the order here on appeal had never been entered. The parties agree that the order, thus interpreted, is correct and in accordance with a stipulation which they had previously entered into. The order is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order of the District Court is not intended to have and will not have any effect upon the rights of the parties to establish, in litigation which is pending in Florida, any claims or defenses which they might have established in that litigation if the order here on appeal had never been entered. The parties agree that the order, thus interpreted, is correct and in accordance with a stipulation which they had previously entered into. The order is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 F.2d 209, 82 U.S. App. D.C. 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlas-mfg-co-v-ashley-cadc-1947.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack