Atlas Mfg. Co. v. Ashley
166 F.2d 209, 82 U.S. App. D.C. 399
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided February 3, 1947·No. No. 9369·Published·Cited by 9 cases
Opinion
The order of the District Court is not intended to have and will not have any effect upon the rights of the parties to establish, in litigation which is pending in Florida, any claims or defenses which they might have established in that litigation if the order here on appeal had never been entered. The parties agree that the order, thus interpreted, is correct and in accordance with a stipulation which they had previously entered into. The order is therefore affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Atlas Mfg. Co. v. Ashley, 166 F.2d 209, 82 U.S. App. D.C. 399 (D.C. Cir. 1947).
166 F.2d 209 (Atlas Mfg. Co. v. Ashley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Makins v. District of Columbia
838 A.2d 300 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2003)
Makins v. District of Columbia
277 F.3d 544 (D.C. Circuit, 2002)
Makins, Brenda E. v. DC
389 F.3d 1303 (D.C. Circuit, 2002)
Evans v. Skinner
742 F. Supp. 30 (District of Columbia, 1990)
Bronson v. Borst
404 A.2d 960 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1979)