Atlas Match Corporation v. Berry Realty Company

236 S.E.2d 554, 142 Ga. App. 588, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1712
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 20, 1977
Docket53796
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 236 S.E.2d 554 (Atlas Match Corporation v. Berry Realty Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atlas Match Corporation v. Berry Realty Company, 236 S.E.2d 554, 142 Ga. App. 588, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1712 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, a Texas corporation brought this suit to recover on a contract. The case was tried by the court. At the conclusion of plaintiffs evidence, defendant’s motion for dismissal was granted solely on the ground that plaintiff was transacting business within Georgia without a certificate of authority from the Secretary of State. Held:

No foreign corporation shall transact business in this state without obtaining a certificate of authority from the Secretary of State. Code § 22-1401 (a). A foreign corporation required to obtain a certificate of authority is not permitted to maintain any suit in any Georgia court unless before commencement the required certificate has been obtained. Code § 22-1421 (b). A foreign corporation "shall not be considered to be transacting business in this State,... solely by reason of carrying on in this State any one or more of the following activities:... (6) Soliciting or procuring orders, whether by mail or through employees or agents or otherwise, where such orders require acceptance without this State before becoming binding contracts, and where such contracts, do not involve any local performance other than delivery and installation.” Code § 22-1401 (b) (6). While the evidence reveals that plaintiff did not obtain the certificate of authority, it was shown without contradiction that plaintiff employed four sales persons in Georgia for the purpose of soliciting orders within this state; that the orders were accepted in Texas and not in Georgia; that it does not manufacture, warehouse, bank,, bill or ship any merchandise within Georgia; and that it did maintain an office for these salesmen to conduct their solicitation activity. This evidence demands the conclusion that the plaintiff was not transacting business within the state and thus could maintain this suit in a Georgia court. The trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion.

Judgment reversed.

McMurray and Smith, JJ., concur. *589 Zusmann, Sikes, Pritchard & Cohen, Jay I. Solomon, for appellant. Howard, Wiggins & Smith, James B. Howard, Jr., for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roberts v. Chancellor Fleet Corp.
354 S.E.2d 628 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Ely & Walker v. DUX-MIXTURE HARDWARE CO., INC.
582 F. Supp. 285 (N.D. Georgia, 1982)
Cosby v. A. M. Smyre Manufacturing Co.
281 S.E.2d 332 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
A. S. International Corp. v. Salem Carpet Mills, Inc.
441 F. Supp. 125 (N.D. Georgia, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 S.E.2d 554, 142 Ga. App. 588, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlas-match-corporation-v-berry-realty-company-gactapp-1977.