Atlas Iron Construction Co. v. Ferguson

New York Supreme Court

Atlas Iron Construction Co. v. Ferguson

26 N.Y.S. 1119, 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 637

DecidedDecember 1, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 26 N.Y.S. 1119 (Atlas Iron Construction Co. v. Ferguson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Atlas Iron Construction Co. v. Ferguson, 26 N.Y.S. 1119, 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 637 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

DYKMAN, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon the report of a referee to hear and determine. The action was brought to foreclose a mechanic’s lien for $1,250.60. The defense was failure to perform the contract made by the plaintiff, and a counterclaim. The referee reported against the plaintiff upon Its principal claim for material, and in its favor for extras* $4.03, and the appeal is by the plaintiff. The questions involved were questions of fact, and the cause was fully tried and carefully examined by the referee. He wrote an opinion in which he carefully analyzed the testimony, and gave abundant reasons for his decision. A further examination of the evidence by ns would subserve no profitable purpose, as we concur in the views of the referee, and with his opinion. The appellant raises a question respecting the allowance ef costs, but we think the plaintiff sustained a substantial defeat upon the merits, and there is no sufficient reason why it should not pay the costs of the litigation it so precipitated without a just claim. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DYKMAN, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon the report of a referee to hear and determine. The action was brought to foreclose a mechanic’s lien for $1,250.60. The defense was failure to perform the contract made by the plaintiff, and a counterclaim. The referee reported against the plaintiff upon Its principal claim for material, and in its favor for extras* $4.03, and the appeal is by the plaintiff. The questions involved were questions of fact, and the cause was fully tried and carefully examined by the referee. He wrote an opinion in which he carefully analyzed the testimony, and gave abundant reasons for his decision. A further examination of the evidence by ns would subserve no profitable purpose, as we concur in the views of the referee, and with his opinion. The appellant raises a question respecting the allowance ef costs, but we think the plaintiff sustained a substantial defeat upon the merits, and there is no sufficient reason why it should not pay the costs of the litigation it so precipitated without a just claim. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 N.Y.S. 1119, 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlas-iron-construction-co-v-ferguson-nysupct-1893.