Atlantis Worldwide, Ltd. v. Benitez
This text of 290 A.D.2d 379 (Atlantis Worldwide, Ltd. v. Benitez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered October 17, 2001, which denied plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The motion court properly exercised its discretion in denying the motion for a preliminary injunction, since plaintiff failed to establish a likelihood of success on the merits, that it will suffer irreparable injury unless the injunction is granted and that the equities balance in its favor (see, W.T. Grant Co. v Srogi, 52 NY2d 496, 517). Plaintiff has not made the showing requisite to the relief sought, that the names of the clients serviced by defendant employee while employed by plaintiff are entitled to trade secret protection, where the identities of those clients are readily ascertainable, or that the employee’s services were unique or extraordinary (see, Reed, Roberts Assoc. v Strauman, 40 NY2d 303, 308). Moreover, the balance of equities is in defendants’ favor and irreparable harm has not been shown where money damages would fully compensate plaintiff for any lost profit attributable to defendant employee’s [380]*380complained of conduct. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Ellerin and Marlow, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
290 A.D.2d 379, 736 N.Y.S.2d 591, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlantis-worldwide-ltd-v-benitez-nyappdiv-2002.