Atlantic & N. C. R. v. Cuyler

Fourth Circuit

Atlantic & N. C. R. v. Cuyler

133 F. 1019, 66 C.C.A. 679, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4480

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 22, 1904

DocketNo. 554

StatusPublished

This text of 133 F. 1019 (Atlantic & N. C. R. v. Cuyler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Atlantic & N. C. R. v. Cuyler, 133 F. 1019, 66 C.C.A. 679, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4480 (4th Cir. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of North Carolina. Pou & Fuller, R. D. Gilmer, W. C. Munroe, A. D. Ward, O. H. Guión, Thomas J. Jarvis, and Busbee & Busbee, for appellants. Woodville Fleming, W. C. Maxwell, Argo & Shaffer, Day & Bell, and W. W. Clark, for appellees. Dismissed, under rule 20 (90 Fed. clxii, 31 C. C. A. clxii), by agreement of attorneys. See 132 Fed. 568, 570; 131 Fed. 95.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of North Carolina. Pou & Fuller, R. D. Gilmer, W. C. Munroe, A. D. Ward, O. H. Guión, Thomas J. Jarvis, and Busbee & Busbee, for appellants. Woodville Fleming, W. C. Maxwell, Argo & Shaffer, Day & Bell, and W. W. Clark, for appellees. Dismissed, under rule 20 (90 Fed. clxii, 31 C. C. A. clxii), by agreement of attorneys. See 132 Fed. 568, 570; 131 Fed. 95.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 F. 1019, 66 C.C.A. 679, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlantic-n-c-r-v-cuyler-ca4-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack