Atlantic Mutual Insurance v. Morris Goldman Real Estate Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Atlantic Mutual Insurance v. Morris Goldman Real Estate Corp.

291 A.D.2d 249, 736 N.Y.S.2d 875, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1557

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 291 A.D.2d 249 (Atlantic Mutual Insurance v. Morris Goldman Real Estate Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Atlantic Mutual Insurance v. Morris Goldman Real Estate Corp., 291 A.D.2d 249, 736 N.Y.S.2d 875, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1557 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.), entered on or about August 8, 2000, which denied defendant-appellant’s motion to set aside a jury verdict in plaintiffs favor, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

Defendant’s right to appeal the order denying its motion to set aside the verdict terminated with the entry of a judgment (Kirby v Turner Constr. Co., 286 AD2d 618). We reject defendant’s argument that its motion to set aside the verdict was in certain respects “addressed to the pleadings” within the meaning of CPLR 5501 (c). Concur — Williams, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin, Lemer and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.), entered on or about August 8, 2000, which denied defendant-appellant’s motion to set aside a jury verdict in plaintiffs favor, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

Defendant’s right to appeal the order denying its motion to set aside the verdict terminated with the entry of a judgment (Kirby v Turner Constr. Co., 286 AD2d 618). We reject defendant’s argument that its motion to set aside the verdict was in certain respects “addressed to the pleadings” within the meaning of CPLR 5501 (c). Concur — Williams, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin, Lemer and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

291 A.D.2d 249, 736 N.Y.S.2d 875, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlantic-mutual-insurance-v-morris-goldman-real-estate-corp-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack