Atlantic Mutual Ins. Co. v. Richards
This text of 251 A.2d 134 (Atlantic Mutual Ins. Co. v. Richards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATLANTIC MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION AND SAPOLIN PAINTS, INC., A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
MARY A. RICHARDS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX, ETC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND NATIONAL LEAD COMPANY, ETC., DEFENDANT, AND THE EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORP., LTD., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
*49 Before Judges SULLIVAN, FOLEY and LEWIS.
Mr. Richard J. Badolato argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Schneider & Morgan, attorneys).
Sonia Napolitano argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Messrs. Pindar, McElroy, Connell & Foley, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment herein is affirmed substantially for the reasons given by Judge Furman in his opinion. In addition, we conclude that Sapolin Paints was not using the vehicle at the time of the accident in question and, therefore, was not an additional insured under Employers' policy.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 A.2d 134, 105 N.J. Super. 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlantic-mutual-ins-co-v-richards-njsuperctappdiv-1969.