Atlantic & Gulf Railroad v. Jacksonville, Pensacola & Mobile Railroad

Supreme Court of Georgia

Atlantic & Gulf Railroad v. Jacksonville, Pensacola & Mobile Railroad

51 Ga. 458

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 15, 1874

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 51 Ga. 458 (Atlantic & Gulf Railroad v. Jacksonville, Pensacola & Mobile Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Atlantic & Gulf Railroad v. Jacksonville, Pensacola & Mobile Railroad, 51 Ga. 458 (Ga. 1874).

Pincite

Opinion

Warner, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff sued out an attachment against the defendant, a foreign corporation, which was levied on its property. The plaintiff filed its declaration, founded on the attachment thus [459]*459levied, and the defendant, by its agent, made the following acknowledgment of service thereon :

“Georgia, Muscogee County: We acknowledge due and legal service of the within declaration, and waive copy process and written notice of the pendency of the attachment and the proceedings thereon, and all further service, this 12th day of May, 1873.

“ L. E. O’Keefe, agent J., P. and M. R. R. Co.”

At the trial, the court refused to allow the plaintiff to take a general judgment against the defendant on the above acknowledgment of service by its agent on the attachment declaration ; whereupon the plaintiff excepted. The plaintiff offered in evidence an instrument in writing by which O’Keefe was appointed the general and local agent of the defendant, at Columbus, Georgia, ,and also proved that he was acting as such agent for the defendant at Columbus when the acknowledgment of service was made by him.

It has been held by this court that a foreign corporation doing business in this state, may be sued by service of process on its agent located here and transacting its business, and in our judgment such agent may acknowledge service of the writ and waive process : See section 3369 of the Code: If a foreign or domestic corporation, may be sued by service of process on its agent, it would seem to follow that such agent may acknowledge service of the writ and waive process, the more especially when, as in this case, the defendant does not dispute the agent’s authority to do so. It was, therefore, error in the court in refusing to allow the plaintiff to have a general judgment entered against the defendant on the statement of facts contained in the record.

Let the judgment of the court below be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warner, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff sued out an attachment against the defendant, a foreign corporation, which was levied on its property. The plaintiff filed its declaration, founded on the attachment thus [459]*459levied, and the defendant, by its agent, made the following acknowledgment of service thereon :

“Georgia, Muscogee County: We acknowledge due and legal service of the within declaration, and waive copy process and written notice of the pendency of the attachment and the proceedings thereon, and all further service, this 12th day of May, 1873.

“ L. E. O’Keefe, agent J., P. and M. R. R. Co.”

At the trial, the court refused to allow the plaintiff to take a general judgment against the defendant on the above acknowledgment of service by its agent on the attachment declaration ; whereupon the plaintiff excepted. The plaintiff offered in evidence an instrument in writing by which O’Keefe was appointed the general and local agent of the defendant, at Columbus, Georgia, ,and also proved that he was acting as such agent for the defendant at Columbus when the acknowledgment of service was made by him.

It has been held by this court that a foreign corporation doing business in this state, may be sued by service of process on its agent located here and transacting its business, and in our judgment such agent may acknowledge service of the writ and waive process : See section 3369 of the Code: If a foreign or domestic corporation, may be sued by service of process on its agent, it would seem to follow that such agent may acknowledge service of the writ and waive process, the more especially when, as in this case, the defendant does not dispute the agent’s authority to do so. It was, therefore, error in the court in refusing to allow the plaintiff to have a general judgment entered against the defendant on the statement of facts contained in the record.

Let the judgment of the court below be reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 Ga. 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlantic-gulf-railroad-v-jacksonville-pensacola-mobile-railroad-ga-1874.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack