Atlantic Gulf Communities Corp. v. City of Port St. Lucie

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Atlantic Gulf Communities Corp. v. City of Port St. Lucie

734 So. 2d 1208, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9297, 1999 WL 492648

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 9, 1999

DocketNo. 97-3330

StatusPublished

This text of 734 So. 2d 1208 (Atlantic Gulf Communities Corp. v. City of Port St. Lucie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Atlantic Gulf Communities Corp. v. City of Port St. Lucie, 734 So. 2d 1208, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9297, 1999 WL 492648 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ON EMERGENCY MOTION TO RECALL MANDATE, MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION, AND MOTION TO ACCEPT MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION AS TIMELY FILED

PER CURIAM.

The City of Port St. Lucie’s emergency motion to recall mandate, motion for certification, and motion to accept an untimely motion for certification as timely filed are denied. The mandate issued on May 28, 1999. The City filed its motions on June 29, 1999. Unlike Thompson v. Singletary, 659 So.2d 435 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), this case does not involve the potential of a miscarriage of justice, which justifies recalling the mandate. The issues in this case are purely legal ones, involving the interpretation of statutory language. Two of the matters cited in Mr. Rosenthal’s supporting affidavit, Florida Administrative Code Rule 12D-18.002(2)(e), and the opinion letter of the Office of General Counsel, Florida Department of Revenue, were cited neither in the proceedings below, nor in the briefs filed by the City, nor in the City’s motion for rehearing filed on March 25, 1999. The motion to recall mandate authorized by the extraordinary circumstances in Thompson is not a vehicle to extend the time limits authorized by the appellate rules, after the denial of a motion for rehearing, to allow new arguments or motions that were not made during the appeal.

DELL, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON EMERGENCY MOTION TO RECALL MANDATE, MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION, AND MOTION TO ACCEPT MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION AS TIMELY FILED

PER CURIAM.

The City of Port St. Lucie’s emergency motion to recall mandate, motion for certification, and motion to accept an untimely motion for certification as timely filed are denied. The mandate issued on May 28, 1999. The City filed its motions on June 29, 1999. Unlike Thompson v. Singletary, 659 So.2d 435 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), this case does not involve the potential of a miscarriage of justice, which justifies recalling the mandate. The issues in this case are purely legal ones, involving the interpretation of statutory language. Two of the matters cited in Mr. Rosenthal’s supporting affidavit, Florida Administrative Code Rule 12D-18.002(2)(e), and the opinion letter of the Office of General Counsel, Florida Department of Revenue, were cited neither in the proceedings below, nor in the briefs filed by the City, nor in the City’s motion for rehearing filed on March 25, 1999. The motion to recall mandate authorized by the extraordinary circumstances in Thompson is not a vehicle to extend the time limits authorized by the appellate rules, after the denial of a motion for rehearing, to allow new arguments or motions that were not made during the appeal.

DELL, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

734 So. 2d 1208, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9297, 1999 WL 492648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlantic-gulf-communities-corp-v-city-of-port-st-lucie-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack