Atlantic Freight Lines, Inc. v. Summerfield, Postmaster General

204 F.2d 64, 92 U.S. App. D.C. 195, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2395
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedApril 2, 1953
Docket11437
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 204 F.2d 64 (Atlantic Freight Lines, Inc. v. Summerfield, Postmaster General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atlantic Freight Lines, Inc. v. Summerfield, Postmaster General, 204 F.2d 64, 92 U.S. App. D.C. 195, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2395 (D.C. Cir. 1953).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a motor carrier competing with the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, sought an injunction to restrain the Postmaster General from issuing a postage stamp .in commemoration of the 125th anniversary of the Railroad’s incorporation. The District Court rightly dismissed the complaint. “It is by now clear that neither damage nor loss of income in consequence of the action of Government, which is not an invasion of recognized legal rights, is in itself a source of legal rights in the absence of constitutional legislation recognizing it as such.” Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co., 310 U.S. 113, 125, 60 S.Ct. 869, 875, 84 L.Ed. 1108.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 F.2d 64, 92 U.S. App. D.C. 195, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlantic-freight-lines-inc-v-summerfield-postmaster-general-cadc-1953.