Atlantic Contracting Co. v. Hyde
33 S.E. 995, 108 Ga. 799, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 439
Opinion
Where a verdict is returned in favor of a plaintiff and a judgment is duly entered thereon, and he subsequently accepts from the defendant payment of the amount therein specified in full settlement of the judgment, the case is at an end, and it is too late to thereafter file an “extraordinary” motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence tending merely to show that the recovery should have been in a larger amount. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Atlantic Contracting Co. v. Hyde, 33 S.E. 995, 108 Ga. 799, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 439 (Ga. 1899).
33 S.E. 995 (Atlantic Contracting Co. v. Hyde) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Marruffo v. McDonald
309 P.2d 235 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1957)