Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Atlantic Commercial Development Corp. v. Nortek, Inc.

Atlantic Commercial Development Corp. v. Nortek, Inc.

411 So. 2d 338, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19560
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 24, 1982·No. No. 81-1120·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court herein entered an order dated August 3,1981, striking the pleadings and motions of three defendants herein— Atlantic Commercial Development Corp., Ruby Mountain Construction and Development Corp., and Meadow Valley Ranchos, Inc. — on grounds they “failed to comply with discovery rules and procedure, and also (the trial court’s) order on motion for substitution of counsel. ...” Based upon our prior opinion in Atlantic Commercial Development Corp. v. Nortek, Inc., 403 So.2d 624 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), we quash the aforesaid order of the trial court, and remand this cause for further proceedings consistent with this, and our prior, opinion.

ORFINGER, COBB and FRANK D. UP-CHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atlantic Commercial Development Corp. v. Nortek, Inc., 411 So. 2d 338, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19560 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

411 So. 2d 338 (Atlantic Commercial Development Corp. v. Nortek, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ATLANTIC COMMERCIAL DEV. CORP. v. Nortek, Inc.
403 So. 2d 624 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)