Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Atlantic Commercial Development Corp. v. Nortek, Inc.

Atlantic Commercial Development Corp. v. Nortek, Inc.

411 So. 2d 338, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19560
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 24, 1982
DocketNo. 81-1120
StatusPublished

This text of 411 So. 2d 338 (Atlantic Commercial Development Corp. v. Nortek, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atlantic Commercial Development Corp. v. Nortek, Inc., 411 So. 2d 338, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19560 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court herein entered an order dated August 3,1981, striking the pleadings and motions of three defendants herein— Atlantic Commercial Development Corp., Ruby Mountain Construction and Development Corp., and Meadow Valley Ranchos, Inc. — on grounds they “failed to comply with discovery rules and procedure, and also (the trial court’s) order on motion for substitution of counsel. ...” Based upon our prior opinion in Atlantic Commercial Development Corp. v. Nortek, Inc., 403 So.2d 624 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), we quash the aforesaid order of the trial court, and remand this cause for further proceedings consistent with this, and our prior, opinion.

ORFINGER, COBB and FRANK D. UP-CHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ATLANTIC COMMERCIAL DEV. CORP. v. Nortek, Inc.
403 So. 2d 624 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
411 So. 2d 338, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlantic-commercial-development-corp-v-nortek-inc-fladistctapp-1982.