Atlantic Coast Lumber Corp. v. Litchfield

73 S.E. 182, 90 S.C. 363, 1912 S.C. LEXIS 59
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedFebruary 19, 1912
Docket8096
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 73 S.E. 182 (Atlantic Coast Lumber Corp. v. Litchfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atlantic Coast Lumber Corp. v. Litchfield, 73 S.E. 182, 90 S.C. 363, 1912 S.C. LEXIS 59 (S.C. 1912).

Opinions

February 19, 1912. The opinion of the Court was delivered by The plaintiff brought this action against defendants to perpetually enjoin them from cutting timber from certain lands described, situated in Berkeley county, in violation of plaintiff's rights alleged to have been acquired under a timber deed and contract executed by A.J. Litchfield and the Atlantic Coast Lumber Company on August 21, 1899. The plaintiff claims as successor of the Atlantic Coast Lumber Company and the defendants claim as grantees of A.J. Litchfield.

The question submitted to the Circuit Court was whether upon a proper construction of the deed, the plaintiff was required to begin to cut the timber within a reasonable time, Judge Memminger, presiding, granted permanent injunction, holding that the deed did not require the plaintiff to commence removal of the timber within a reasonable time after its execution. The timber deed and contract in question is substantially in the terms of the deed and contract construed in Flagler v. Atlantic Coast Lumber Corporation,89 S.C. 328, and McClary v. Atlantic Coast Lumber Corporation,infra 153, 72 S.E. 145, and it is conceded by respondent that these cases warrant reversal if the Court adheres to the construction therein made. The Court is not disposed to disturb the authority of those cases. Judge Memminger's ruling was previous to the filing of the decision in the above named cases.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed. *Page 365

MR. JUSTICE WOODS did not sit in this case.

February 19.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murray v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.
5 S.E.2d 560 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1939)
Lucas v. North Carolina Mutual Life Ins.
191 S.E. 711 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1937)
Boynton v. Consolidated Indemnity Ins. Co.
185 S.E. 731 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1936)
Robertson v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins.
15 F. Supp. 329 (W.D. South Carolina, 1936)
Nofal v. Lincoln Reserve Life Ins. Co.
174 S.E. 652 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1934)
Norfolk Bank for Savings & Trusts v. Whipple
254 F. 195 (E.D. South Carolina, 1918)
Crown Orchard Co. v. Dennis
220 F. 516 (D. South Carolina, 1915)
Minshew v. Atlantic Coast Lumber Corp.
81 S.E. 1027 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 S.E. 182, 90 S.C. 363, 1912 S.C. LEXIS 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlantic-coast-lumber-corp-v-litchfield-sc-1912.