Atlantic Coast Line Railway v. Hobbs

70 So. 939, 71 Fla. 109, 1916 Fla. LEXIS 483
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 5, 1916·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Hobbs obtained a judgment for $1,500.00 against the railroad company for injuries to [110]*110himself and, his automobile sustained by a collision at a railroad crossing on a street in a town, and the company took writ of error. The proven value of the automobile injury is perhaps less than $400.00, and the personal injuries were not very great. There is evidence that the plaintiff as well as the defendant was negligent, in which case the statute requires the damages to be diminished in proportion to the amount of default attributable to the plaintiff. Sec. 3149 Gen. Stats. of 1906. Where the amount of damages awarded indicates that the jury did not diminish the damages sustained by the plaintiff in proportion to the fault attributable to the plaintiff as required by the statute, the judgment will be reversed. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Weir, 63 Fla. 69, 58 South. Rep. 641.

The judgment is reversed and a new trial awarded.

All concur, except Cockrell, J., absent by reason of sickness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atlantic Coast Line Railway v. Hobbs, 70 So. 939, 71 Fla. 109, 1916 Fla. LEXIS 483 (Fla. 1916).

70 So. 939 (Atlantic Coast Line Railway v. Hobbs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bruce Kyle Emerson v. Kyle Michael Lambert
Supreme Court of Florida, 2023
Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Francis Melville Townsend
143 So. 445 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Conant
84 So. 688 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1920)