Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Yesbik

59 S.E. 716, 3 Ga. App. 196, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 591
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 9, 1907·No. 498·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Russell, J.

At the trial in September, the judge overruled demurrers to the declaration and refused a nonsuit, to which rulings exceptions pendente lite were duly preserved by the defendant. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff; the defendant made a motion for a new trial, which was heard and overruled in April following the trial. The bill of exceptions neither excepts to nor assigns error upon the order overruling the motion for a new trial. The failure to assign error upon the final judgment is not fatal, but the failure to except thereto is. Lyndon v. Ga. Ry. & Elec. Co., 129 Ga. 354 (58 S. E. 1047). The writ of error, therefore, not being such as to confer jurisdiction upon this court, must be.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Yesbik, 59 S.E. 716, 3 Ga. App. 196, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 591 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).

59 S.E. 716 (Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Yesbik) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hilburn v. Scott Banking Co.
67 S.E. 838 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)
Ocean Steamship Co. v. McDuffie
65 S.E. 703 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)