Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Woods Ex Rel. Estate of Woods

148 So. 542, 110 Fla. 147
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 9, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 148 So. 542 (Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Woods Ex Rel. Estate of Woods) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Woods Ex Rel. Estate of Woods, 148 So. 542, 110 Fla. 147 (Fla. 1933).

Opinions

Pee Curiam.

In an action by an administrator to recover damages for the alleged wrongful death of his decedent, the court directed a verdict for the defendant at *148 the close of the testimony, and subsequently granted a new trial. Defendant took writ of error. The motion for new trial contains grounds that the verdict is contrary to the law and. to the evidence, and that the court erred in directing a verdict for the defendant.

There is evidence upon which a finding of liability of the defendant under the statute may be predicated under the issues, even if the evidence may be regarded as indicating contributory negligence of the decedent; and there is evidence from which the jury might lawfully have found that the decedent, in good health and aged thirty-six years, would probably have lived some period of time and have accumulated and left at his death property of at least small value, had he not died as a result of defendant’s negligence as alleged. The statute makes the death by wrongful act a tort for which at least nominal damages may be recovered by an administrator of the decedent. Jacksonville El. Co. v. Bowden, 51 Fla. 152, 45 So. 755. In granting a new trial the court corrected the error made in directing a verdict for the defendant.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, TeRRell and Brown, J. J., concur. Ellis and Buford, J. J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Herzig v. Swift & Co.
146 F.2d 444 (Second Circuit, 1945)
International Shoe Co. v. Hewitt
167 So. 7 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 So. 542, 110 Fla. 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlantic-coast-line-railroad-v-woods-ex-rel-estate-of-woods-fla-1933.