Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Stoll

82 So. 64, 77 Fla. 632

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This cause having been submitted to the Court at a former term upon the transcript of the record of the judgment aforesaid', and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seem to the Court that there is no error in said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the C'onrt that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is, hereby affirmed.

All concur.