Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Shuman

48 S.E. 680, 121 Ga. 113, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 35
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 17, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 48 S.E. 680 (Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Shuman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Shuman, 48 S.E. 680, 121 Ga. 113, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 35 (Ga. 1904).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

“When the only error alleged in a petition for certiorari is that the verdict therein complained of is contrary to law and to the evidence, and it appears that the evidence demanded a verdict for the plaintiff in certiorari, the superior court should, of course, sustain the certiorari; hut it is erroneous in such a case, though there he no conflict in the evidence, to render a final judgment in his favor.” Holmes v. Pye, 107 Ga. 784; Patterson v. Railway Co., 117 Ga. 827.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lewallen v. Dalton Auto & Machinery Co.
195 S.E. 305 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Strickland v. Strickland
139 S.E. 529 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)
Whiddon v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
94 S.E. 617 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
State v. Johnson
94 S.E. 325 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Pittman v. Alexander
91 S.E. 910 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 S.E. 680, 121 Ga. 113, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlantic-coast-line-railroad-v-shuman-ga-1904.