Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Shuman
48 S.E. 680, 121 Ga. 113, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 35
Opinion
“When the only error alleged in a petition for certiorari is that the verdict therein complained of is contrary to law and to the evidence, and it appears that the evidence demanded a verdict for the plaintiff in certiorari, the superior court should, of course, sustain the certiorari; hut it is erroneous in such a case, though there he no conflict in the evidence, to render a final judgment in his favor.” Holmes v. Pye, 107 Ga. 784; Patterson v. Railway Co., 117 Ga. 827.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Shuman, 48 S.E. 680, 121 Ga. 113, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 35 (Ga. 1904).
48 S.E. 680 (Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Shuman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lewallen v. Dalton Auto & Machinery Co.
195 S.E. 305 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Strickland v. Strickland
139 S.E. 529 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)
Whiddon v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
94 S.E. 617 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
State v. Johnson
94 S.E. 325 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Pittman v. Alexander
91 S.E. 910 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)