Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Savage

90 S.E. 735, 19 Ga. App. 21, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 12
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 22, 1916
Docket7513
StatusPublished

This text of 90 S.E. 735 (Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Savage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Savage, 90 S.E. 735, 19 Ga. App. 21, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 12 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Hill, J.

The exceptions to extracts from the charge of the court, when considered in connection with the entire instructions, are without merit. In the instructions given, all the material issues made by the pleading and the evidence were covered clearly and correctly, and without injury to any contention of the defendant. The record makes no new or interesting question of law, and the verdict—the second for the plaintiff— was moderate and supported by the evidence. There was no error in refusing another trial. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 S.E. 735, 19 Ga. App. 21, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlantic-coast-line-railroad-v-savage-gactapp-1916.