Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Ousley Co.

150 S.E. 564, 40 Ga. App. 555, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 648
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Ousley Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 37 Ga. App. 215
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 14, 1929·No. 19494·Published

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

Under a former adjudication of the law of this case (Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Ousley Co., 37 Ga. App. 215, 139 S. E. 586), the petition set forth a cause of action, and the plaintiff was entitled to recover on proof of the allegations made. Since the agreed statement of facts and the evidence submitted proved the plaintiff’s case substantially as laid, the judgment in its favor was authorized.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., concur. Copeland & Dukes, Bennel & Branch, for plaintiff in error. Little & Dickerson, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Ousley Co., 150 S.E. 564, 40 Ga. App. 555, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 648 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

150 S.E. 564 (Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Ousley Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Ousley Co.
139 S.E. 586 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)