Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Murray
This text of 134 S.E. 171 (Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Court of Appeals' certified. the following question: “Where the seller in interstate commerce ships to its own order merchandise, and a through bill of lading is issued to it by the initial carrier, and it is provided that the purchaser be notified, and to the bill of lading there is attached a draft for the value of the merchandise, and where, after the arrival at its destination, the purchaser pays the draft, secures the bill of lading, and takes possession of the merchandise, can he, as the holder of the bill of lading, maintain an action for damages against the last connecting carrier for an injury to the merchandise caused by the negligence of that carrier, when he acquired title thereto after the damages sought to be recovered were inflicted?” Held:
Under the rulings in Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Yesbik, 146 Ga. 769 (92 S. E. 527), Southern Railway Co. v. Morris, 147 Ga. 729 (95 S. E. 284), and Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Olivet, 243 U. S. 574 (37 Sup. Ct. 468, 61 L. ed. 908), the question mUst be answered in the affirmative.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
134 S.E. 171, 162 Ga. 589, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlantic-coast-line-railroad-v-murray-ga-1926.