Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Cox

75 S.E. 268, 11 Ga. App. 384, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 414
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 23, 1912·No. 4246·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Pottle, J.

The plaintiff’s right to recover resting solely upon the statutory presumption of negligence, and the undisputed testimony of the engineer and fireman showing that they were in the exercise of all ordinary care and diligence, and that the killing of the plaintiff’s cow was not due to any negligence on the part of the defendant or its employees, the presumption of negligence was fully rebutted, and the recovery in favor of the plaintiff was unauthorized. Macon, Dublin & Savannah R. Co. v. Hamilton, 9 Ga. App. 254 (70 S. E. 1126); Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Whitaker, 10 Ga. App. 207 (73 S. E. 34).

Judgment reversed.

Certiorari; from Decatur superior court — Judge Frank Park. May 12, 1912. Pope & Bennet R. G. Hartsfield, for plaintiff in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Cox, 75 S.E. 268, 11 Ga. App. 384, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 414 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

75 S.E. 268 (Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Cox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Martin
53 S.E.2d 176 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Crisp
132 S.E. 253 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Georgia Railroad v. Henderson
120 S.E. 638 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Georgia Coast & Piedmont Railroad v. Smith
95 S.E. 1017 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Whiddon v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
94 S.E. 617 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)