Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Anderson

160 So. 521, 118 Fla. 785, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1778
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 15, 1935
StatusPublished

This text of 160 So. 521 (Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Anderson, 160 So. 521, 118 Fla. 785, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1778 (Fla. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Buford, and Mr. Justice Davis are of the opinion that the judgment of the Circuit Court should be affirmed, while Mr. Justice Ellis, Mr. Justice Terrell and Mr. Justice Brown are of the opinion that the said judgment should be reversed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are *786 permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed, therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State, ex rel. Hampton, v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 So. 521, 118 Fla. 785, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlantic-coast-line-railroad-v-anderson-fla-1935.