Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Scott
This text of 102 So. 828 (Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Writ of error was taken by defendant below to review a judgment against it for $5,000.00 in damages for injuries to plaintiff alleged to have been sustained as a result of the negligent operation of defendant’s train.
*2 There is basis in the evidence for a finding of legal liabiltiy within the allegations for compensatory damages, but the amount awarded is considered excessive. If, within 30 flays after the filing of the mandate in the trial court, the plaintiff will enter remittitur of $2,000.00 of the amount, the judgment will stand affirmed for $3,000.00; otherwise, the judgment is reversed for a new trial. City of Miami v. Firth, 85 Fla. 263, 95 South. Rep. 573; Lunham v. DeMerritt, 83 Fla. 708, 93 South. Rep. 148; Tampa Electric Co. v. Gaffga, 81 Fla. 268, 87 South. Rep. 922; Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Oeland, 88 Fla. 122, 101 South. Rep. 360.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 So. 828, 89 Fla. 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlantic-coast-line-railroad-co-v-scott-fla-1925.