Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Brotherhood of Railway Trainmen
This text of 385 U.S. 20 (Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Brotherhood of Railway Trainmen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD CO. ET. AL.
v.
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY TRAINMEN ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
Paul A. Porter and Dennis G. Lyons argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the briefs were Abe Krash and Daniel A. Rezneck.
Neal Rutledge and Allan Milledge argued the cause for respondents. With them on the brief was Lester P. Schoene.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
385 U.S. 20, 87 S. Ct. 226, 17 L. Ed. 2d 20, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlantic-coast-line-railroad-co-v-brotherhood-of-railway-trainmen-scotus-1966.