Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Brotherhood of Railway Trainmen
385 U.S. 20, 87 S. Ct. 226, 17 L. Ed. 2d 20, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2871
Opinion
ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD CO. ET. AL.
v.
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY TRAINMEN ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
Paul A. Porter and Dennis G. Lyons argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the briefs were Abe Krash and Daniel A. Rezneck.
Neal Rutledge and Allan Milledge argued the cause for respondents. With them on the brief was Lester P. Schoene.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Brotherhood of Railway Trainmen, 385 U.S. 20, 87 S. Ct. 226, 17 L. Ed. 2d 20, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2871 (1966).
385 U.S. 20 (Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Brotherhood of Railway Trainmen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers & Express & Station Employees
605 F.2d 1073 (Eighth Circuit, 1979)
Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n
325 F. Supp. 994 (D. Minnesota, 1970)
Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.
394 U.S. 369 (Supreme Court, 1969)