Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Brotherhood of Railway Trainmen

385 U.S. 20, 87 S. Ct. 226, 17 L. Ed. 2d 20, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2871
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 24, 1966·No. 220·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

385 U.S. 20 (1966)

ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD CO. ET. AL.
v.
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY TRAINMEN ET AL.

No. 220.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued October 10, 1966.
Decided October 24, 1966.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.

Paul A. Porter and Dennis G. Lyons argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the briefs were Abe Krash and Daniel A. Rezneck.

Neal Rutledge and Allan Milledge argued the cause for respondents. With them on the brief was Lester P. Schoene.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Brotherhood of Railway Trainmen, 385 U.S. 20, 87 S. Ct. 226, 17 L. Ed. 2d 20, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2871 (1966).

385 U.S. 20 (Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Brotherhood of Railway Trainmen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related