Atlantic Coast Line R. R. v. Tyner
278 U.S. 565, 49 S. Ct. 35
Opinion
Reversed and remanded for a new trial on the authority of (1) Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. v. Coogan, 271 U. S. 472; (2) Southern Pacific Co. v. Berkshire, 254 U. S. 415; Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. v. Leitch, 276 U. S. 429; (3) Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Ry. v. Moser, 275 U. S. 133.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Atlantic Coast Line R. R. v. Tyner, 278 U.S. 565, 49 S. Ct. 35 (1928).
278 U.S. 565 (Atlantic Coast Line R. R. v. Tyner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.
352 U.S. 521 (Supreme Court, 1957)
Squier v. Martin
131 N.J. Eq. 263 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1942)
Temple v. Atlantic Coast Line R.R. Co.
163 S.E. 644 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1931)
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Powe
283 U.S. 401 (Supreme Court, 1931)
Powe v. A.C.L.R. R. Co.
159 S.E. 473 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1930)