Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Meinhard, Schaul & Co.
This text of 66 S.E. 897 (Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Meinhard, Schaul & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. For the value of goods sold and consigned to a vendee, and lost in transit by a common carrier, a right of action exists in the vendor against the carrier, who had receipted the vendor for them and recited in the receipt that the goods were “to be delivered . without unnecessary d'elay” to the vendee, although the vendee may have paid for the goods and the freight thsreon.
2. The ruling just announced results from the general rule that a consignor who has no title to the goods lost may maintain an action for breach of the contract ol carriage. See, on the general subject, C. & A. R. Co. v. Shea, 66 Ill. (Freeman) 472 (5); Great Western R. Co. v. McComas, 33 Ill. (Freeman) 185; Carter v. Southern Ry. Co., 111 Ga. [685]*68538 (36 S. E. 308, 50 L. R. A. 354); Southern Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 2 Ga. App. 36 (58 S. E. 333); Ross v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co., 119 Mo. App. 290 (95 S. W. 977) ; Hooper v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co., 27 Wis. 81 (9 Am. R. 439).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 S.E. 897, 133 Ga. 684, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlantic-coast-line-r-co-v-meinhard-schaul-co-ga-1909.