Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. McEachern

94 So. 784, 19 Ala. App. 40, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 22
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 14, 1922
Docket4 Div. 780.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 94 So. 784 (Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. McEachern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. McEachern, 94 So. 784, 19 Ala. App. 40, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 22 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

SAMPORD, J.

Action for damages for negligent killing -of a mule. The plaintiff,' by undisputed evidence, made out- his prima facie ease, which entitled him to a recovery, unless defendant acquitted itself of negligence, as is'provided by section 5476 of the Code of 1907. This, under, the evidence in this ease, was a question for the jury. The court did- not commit error in refusing to give, at the request of the defendant, the general affirmative charge.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

L. N. R. Co. v. Holmes
27 So. 2d 878 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 So. 784, 19 Ala. App. 40, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlantic-coast-line-r-co-v-mceachern-alactapp-1922.