Atlantic Coast Development Corp. v. Hofco, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Atlantic Coast Development Corp. v. Hofco, Inc.

405 So. 2d 797, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21684

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 18, 1981

DocketNo. 79-1983

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 405 So. 2d 797 (Atlantic Coast Development Corp. v. Hofco, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Atlantic Coast Development Corp. v. Hofco, Inc., 405 So. 2d 797, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21684 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We vacate our opinion filed September 9, 1981 and grant rehearing. It is now apparent that appellant did object at the trial court to an award of attorney’s fees to appellees on the ground that appellees’ counsel failed to testify at the hearing on their motion for fees. As we held in Cohen v. Cohen, 400 So.2d 463 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), the testimony of appellees’ attorney should have been required by the trial court. Accordingly, we grant the motion for rehearing, and reverse and remand to the trial court for the opportunity for a further hearing. See Cohen, supra, at 465.

LETTS, C. J., and MOORE and GLICK-STEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We vacate our opinion filed September 9, 1981 and grant rehearing. It is now apparent that appellant did object at the trial court to an award of attorney’s fees to appellees on the ground that appellees’ counsel failed to testify at the hearing on their motion for fees. As we held in Cohen v. Cohen, 400 So.2d 463 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), the testimony of appellees’ attorney should have been required by the trial court. Accordingly, we grant the motion for rehearing, and reverse and remand to the trial court for the opportunity for a further hearing. See Cohen, supra, at 465.

LETTS, C. J., and MOORE and GLICK-STEIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

405 So. 2d 797, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlantic-coast-development-corp-v-hofco-inc-fladistctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack