Atlantic City v. Fanslar

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Atlantic City v. Fanslar

57 A. 1133, 70 N.J.L. 491, 41 Vroom 491, 1904 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 179

DecidedFebruary 23, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 57 A. 1133 (Atlantic City v. Fanslar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Atlantic City v. Fanslar, 57 A. 1133, 70 N.J.L. 491, 41 Vroom 491, 1904 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 179 (N.J. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

[492]*492The opinion oí the court was delivered by

Port, J.

The conviction in this case is affirmed for the reasons given in Atlantic City v. Feretti, decided at the present term.

The offence in this case was that the prosecutor did “charge more than the legal fare for conveying a passenger from one point to another in said city.”

The regulation is fixed by the same ordinance as that sustained as reasonable in the Feretti case. Atlantic City v. Fonsler, ante p. 125.

There was abundant evidence to sustain the conviction in, this case.

The conviction is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI