Atlantic City v. Fanslar

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Atlantic City v. Fanslar

57 A. 1133, 70 N.J.L. 491, 41 Vroom 491, 1904 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 179

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 23, 1904·Published

Opinion

[492]*492The opinion oí the court was delivered by

Port, J.

The conviction in this case is affirmed for the reasons given in Atlantic City v. Feretti, decided at the present term.

The offence in this case was that the prosecutor did “charge more than the legal fare for conveying a passenger from one point to another in said city.”

The regulation is fixed by the same ordinance as that sustained as reasonable in the Feretti case. Atlantic City v. Fonsler, ante p. 125.

There was abundant evidence to sustain the conviction in, this case.

The conviction is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[492]*492The opinion oí the court was delivered by

Port, J.

The conviction in this case is affirmed for the reasons given in Atlantic City v. Feretti, decided at the present term.

The offence in this case was that the prosecutor did “charge more than the legal fare for conveying a passenger from one point to another in said city.”

The regulation is fixed by the same ordinance as that sustained as reasonable in the Feretti case. Atlantic City v. Fonsler, ante p. 125.

There was abundant evidence to sustain the conviction in, this case.

The conviction is affirmed, with costs.

Atlantic City v. Fanslar, 57 A. 1133, 70 N.J.L. 491, 41 Vroom 491, 1904 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 179 (N.J. 1904).

Pincite

57 A. 1133 (Atlantic City v. Fanslar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.