Atlantic City Gas & Water Co. v. Consumers Gas & Fuel Co.

70 A. 1100, 74 N.J. Eq. 455, 4 Buchanan 455, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 276
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 15, 1908·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was an injunction bill. An application for a prelinrinary injunction was heard by Vice-Chancellor Bergen, who denied it for reasons expressed by him .in an opinion reported in 70 N. J. Eq. (4 Robb.) 536. The cause was afterward^ submitted’ on final hearing to Vice-Chancellor Learning upon the same testimony. He concurred in the views. of Vice-Chancellor Bergen, and advised the dismissal of the bill of complaint.

We likewise concur, and the decree of dismissal should be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, 'Trenchard, Parker, Bogert, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill — 11. For reversal — None.

[457]*457CASES ADJUDGED IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ' MAY TERM, 1908.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atlantic City Gas & Water Co. v. Consumers Gas & Fuel Co., 70 A. 1100, 74 N.J. Eq. 455, 4 Buchanan 455, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 276 (N.J. 1908).

70 A. 1100 (Atlantic City Gas & Water Co. v. Consumers Gas & Fuel Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Application of Saddle River
362 A.2d 552 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1976)
Mosig v. Jersey Chiropodists, Inc.
194 A. 248 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1937)